Iraq troops liberate parts of key town

Iraqi soldiers, backed by volunteer forces, have liberated two areas in the northern strategic oil town of Baiji from the ISIL Takfiri militants, army sources say.

On Friday, Iraqi armed forces “entered the town of Baiji … and moved into al-Sinai and al-Tamim neighborhoods and cleared them,” said Staff Lieutenant General Abdulwahab al-Saadi, the commander of the military units stationed in the area.

Following heavy fighting overnight, the Iraqi forces managed to push into Baiji, located some 210 kilometers (130 miles) north of the capital, Baghdad, taking control of the two southern districts.

An Iraqi army major general, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the army operation was interrupted by an ISIL assault on the Iraqi command headquarters at Tikrit University, located 140 kilometers (87 miles) northwest of Baghdad.

According to the official, three bombers tried to blow up their explosives-laden vehicles at the university, but security forces foiled their attack and killed a number of Takfiri militants.

Iraqi troops have recently stepped up their efforts to clear more territories and retake full control of Baiji from the ISIL terrorists.

Baiji is placed on a main road to the northern city of Mosul, which is controlled by the ISIL extremists, and its liberation can choke off the supply lines of the militants.

The town fell into the hands of the ISIL several weeks ago, but Iraqi forces managed to prevent the ISIL terror group from taking over the Baiji refinery, which is the country’s largest.

The new military operations in Baiji came shortly after Iraqi soldiers successfully drove out the last batch of ISIL Takfiri terrorists from the town of Jurf al-Sakhar, which sits on a major road linking Baghdad to oil-rich provinces in the south.

MSM/MKA/SS

Bahrain issues 3,500 years of jail terms

The courts in Bahrain have handed down 3,500 years of prison sentences to anti-government protesters over the past three months, the country’s main opposition bloc says.

The al-Wefaq National Islamic Association condemned the Manama regime for intensifying its crackdown on dissent, saying the prison terms were passed against 320 people on political charges.

The association also said the Manama regime arrested over 300 opposition figures during the three months starting in July.

The incarcerated individuals included five women and 30 children, al-Wefaq added.

During the period, there were over 600 house raids across Bahrain and the nationalities of 18 people were also revoked over political charges, the opposition group said.

The association also pointed to over 100 cases of torture and ill-treatment of opposition by the regime during the same period.

Since mid-February 2011, thousands of anti-regime protesters have held numerous demonstrations in the streets of Bahrain, calling for the Al Khalifa royal family to relinquish power.

On March 14, 2011, troops from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates invaded the country to assist the Bahraini government in its crackdown on peaceful protesters.

Many Bahrainis have been killed and hundreds injured and arrested in the regime’s ongoing crackdown on peaceful demonstrations.

ASH/HMV/SS

GOP plans to stop voters in elections

There is a database housed in Arkansas with your name in it … that is, if you live in one of the 28 states participating in the Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck Program. It’s one of the growing components of an aggressive drive across the U.S. by Republicans to stop many Americans from voting.

Early voting has already begun in many states in the 2014 U.S. midterm elections. Control of the U.S. Senate hangs in the balance, as do many crucial governorships, congressional races and ballot initiatives. One question looming over this election is just how significant will be the impact of the wholesale, organized disenfranchisement of eligible voters.

I spoke with Dolores Internicola in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., ground zero for the voter-purge efforts of embattled Republican Gov. Rick Scott. She lost her husband, Bill, recently. He was in the news in 2012, when, at the age of 91, Bill received an official notice in the mail that his citizenship was in question, and he would have to prove it or be kicked off the voter rolls. As a World War II veteran who fought in the Battle of the Bulge, the native New Yorker was upset to hear that he couldn’t participate in the vote that he helped defend against Nazi Germany. “It was terrible,” his widow recalled. Bill did get to vote in the 2012 elections, but millions are now threatened with similar, arbitrary disenfranchisement this year.

Investigative journalist Greg Palast, along with documentary filmmaker Richard Rowley, crisscrossed the country, documenting the impact of the Crosscheck Program. His critical investigative reporting of the now-legendary electoral debacle in Florida in 2000 helped expose how Florida’s then-Secretary of State Katherine Harris oversaw massive, erroneous voter purges there, giving the presidency to George W. Bush in what remains the most controversial presidential election in U.S. history.

“Now, it’s a decade and a half later, and I’m hearing the cry of ‘voter fraud. There’s a million people committing voter fraud.’ Is there really this big crime wave?” Palast asks in his two-part special on alleged “double voting” produced for Al-Jazeera America.

The Crosscheck system described by Palast started with Kansas Republican Secretary of State Kris Kobach. It takes electronic records of voters from participating states, collects them in a centralized database in Arkansas and attempts to match individual voters who might have voted in more than one state. This “double voting” was responsible, according to conservative commentator Dick Morris, for 1 million fraudulent votes for Barack Obama, allowing him to “steal the election” in 2012. Yet, as Palast reports, there has not been a single successful prosecution of electoral fraud as a result of the Crosscheck system. Rather, Crosscheck has led to massive purges of eligible voters from the rolls, often based on sloppy data.

Purging of the voter rolls is just one way that Republicans are working to limit the vote. Key court decisions in recent weeks have all but guaranteed that tens of thousands of voters will be denied access to their right to vote. Texas just passed a highly restrictive photo-identification law. The U.S. Supreme Court decided not to rule on the substance of it until after the election in order to avoid confusion. In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote, “The greatest threat to public confidence in elections in this case is the prospect of enforcing a purposefully discriminatory law, one that likely imposes an unconstitutional poll tax and risks denying the right to vote to hundreds of thousands of eligible voters.”

Restrictive voter identification and other obstructions have been allowed to move forward as well in Wisconsin and North Carolina. It has been long acknowledged that photo-ID requirements disproportionately impact poor people and people of color, two groups that tend to vote for the Democratic Party.

In the fall of 1980, Paul Weyrich, a conservative activist who went on to found such right-wing institutions as The Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the American Legislative Exchange Council, addressed a conference in Dallas. “I don’t want everybody to vote,” he said. “Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.” Weyrich’s wish back in 1980 has become a grim reality in 2014. The right to vote is sacred, and its protection is the responsibility of us all.

SB/AGB

US, Turkey still ‘dedicated’ to Assad fall

An American foreign policy expert says the United States and Turkey are still dedicated to the ouster of the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

James George Jatras, former US Senate foreign policy analyst, made the remarks in a phone interview with Press TV on Thursday while commenting on a Washington Post report which says Turkey and the US are at odds over Syria.

“[T]he divergence of views between Washington and Ankara is a drama that’s been played along for several years now,” Jatras said.

“There are differences of opinion of Gaza; there are certainly differences over Syria. However, Turkey seems to be something of an addiction that Washington seems unable to break,” he added.

Syria has been gripped by deadly violence since 2011. The United States and some of its regional allies — especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey — have been supporting the militants operating in Syria.

“Given the lack of options in the greater Middle East, Turkey still seems to be regarded as the essential country even though the policy direction Washington and Ankara seems to be less and less compatible,” Jatras said.

“So we have to wait and see that to what extent this current diversion will be more significant than it has been in last few years. Whether this will help Syria or the Damascus government or not is not certain,” he noted.

“In principle still both Washington and Ankara are dedicated to the removal of the Assad government, although Turkey is more insistent on it. We have to see how this plays out,” the analyst concluded.

The ISIL terrorists, who were initially trained by the CIA in Jordan in 2012 to destabilize the Syrian government, now control large swaths of territory in Iraq and Syria.

Since late September, the US and some of its Arab allies have been carrying out airstrikes against ISIL inside Syria without any authorization from Damascus or a UN mandate.

The Pentagon also plans to train and arm 5,000 militants in Syria as part of the Obama administration’s long-term strategy to confront ISIL.

Some analysts have long maintained that the United States and its allies have seized on the ISIL threat to target the Syrian government. The US and its allies have been accused of funding and arming the insurgency in Syria.

Alan Sabrosky, a US Marine Corps veteran, has said that the United States’ airstrikes in Syria often target militants with “no military value” and actually aim at the country’s infrastructure.

GJH/GJH

Iran criticizes wrong regional policies

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has criticized the wrong policies adopted by certain countries in the region, blaming those policies for spread of extremism.

“Unfortunately, adopting wrong policies in the region in the past has caused the spread of a wave of extremism…which must stop,” the Iranian foreign minister said on Thursday after his arrival in the Chinese capital, Beijing.

The Chinese city will host the 4th Ministerial Conference of Istanbul Process on Afghanistan on Friday.

The conference was first launched in 2011 to help promote coordination between Afghanistan and other regional countries to counter common threats, including terrorism and extremism. It is attended by 14 countries as its members and around 30 others as supporting countries.

The third conference was held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on April 26.

Zarif said the solution to the scourge of extremism hinges on the adoption of a new policy toward Afghanistan and the region by the conference’s member countries.

He further stressed that none of the member countries can solve the problems in Afghanistan by themselves, adding, “Only through unity, convergence, and prioritizing Afghanistan’s problems can we be hopeful to solve them.”

The United States, Britain, and their allies invaded Afghanistan in 2001 as part of their so-called war on terror. Although the offensive removed the Taliban from power, insecurity continues to rise across the country.

IA/HJL/SS

3rd Century A.H. Quran Copy at Al-Aqsa Mosque

The oldest Quran copy held in Al-Alqsa Mosque dates back to the 3rd century A.H., an official with the library of the mosque said.

According to Masdarak website, Uzbaki, who is in charge of the manuscripts of the library, introduced the valuable Quranic works in a seminar titled “Manuscripts of the Holy Quds and Palestine and the Importance of Research on These works and Their publication”.

The seminar was held on October 28 at Bethlehem University of Palestine.

He stressed the scientific, historical and artistic value of the manuscripts adding that the oldest manuscript copies of the Quran were written in the first five centuries after the advent of Islam.

The official said that the library is the most important one in the Holy Quds with more than 2000 manuscripts and over 200 Quran copies.

Uzbaki went on to say that the oldest page of a manuscript Quran copy available today is kept at Leiden University in the Netherlands and dates back to the years between 70 and 80 A.H.

/129

Australian Shiite Imam: Death Sentence against Saudi Sheikh Nimr Violates Civil and Divine Laws

The death sentence handed to the prominent Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr Baqer al-Nimr violates the Divine as well as civil laws, the imam of Al-Reda Mosque in Sydney, Australia said.

In an interview, Sheikh Nami Farhat Al-Ameli added that by issuing such a verdict, the Saudi regime seeks to intimidate the opposition and appease the extremists.  

Sheikh Nimr Baqir al-Nimr was sentenced to death on October 15 by the Specialized Criminal Court in the Saudi capital, Riyadh.
Here are Sheikh Al-Ameli’s views about the verdict and the reasons behind it.  

Q: What reasons do you think are behind the death sentence?
A: The Saudi regime is built on a system of dictatorship, everything in the country (including people) belong to one family. So when a voice is raised calling for equality between citizens or asking for some rights it is obvious that such a regime will utilise its power to destroy it. Adding to this that the Saudi regime is built not only on the system of dictatorship but also on the Wahabism beliefs that don’t consider the Shi’a school of thought as Muslims. So how about if a scholar from this -as they claim- disbeliever group stands up and speaks against his people’s oppression?

Q: What objectives does Saudi Arabia pursue by issuing such a verdict?
A: In my opinion the Saudi regime wants to send three messages. The First message is to the opposition making them aware that any stand that opposes us publicly the result will be execution even if you are considered an important figure in the Islamic nation.
The Second message is to the right wing in the country showing them that they are applying the Islamic laws according to their beliefs, and I believe this is a very important message that the Saudi regime wants to deliver. As nowadays there is a big debate taking place between extreme groups in the Saudi regime whether their government is practicing Islam laws correctly (according to their beliefs) or should they take sides with ISIS (ISIL) and other extreme parties. By issuing the death sentence, the Saudi regime sent a clear message to this particular group, also convincing them they have an enemy inside their country (i.e. the Shias) and they arrested their leader. So there is no need for you to help or join ISIS which may cause damage inside the country as we will protect you from the enemy.

The third message the Saudi regime wants to send is for the world stating that they are still strong! It is important as in the past few years many problems occurred within the Saudi family, and the king is on his death bed. The message is to state that we are still able to protect our regime.
However I highly doubt that they will execute the death sentence on Sheikh Al Nimr. It is only messages that they want to deliver and they have been successful in some.

Q: Is the sentence justifiable according to Islamic laws as well as in terms of human rights?
A: The death sentence against Sheikh Nimr Baqer al-Nimr violates civil and divine laws. The Human rights declaration states “All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law” (description of the UN declaration article 7, the United Nations). In Islam we do not find any ruling stating that you can kill a human being if he asks for justice; in fact Islam is built on a just system, anyone who reads the history will know how even non-Muslims used to live under the Islamic government which protected them, and the Islamic Republic of Iran today is a clear example of a true Islamic government that gives the opportunity to the minorities ( including Sunnis, Christians, Jews, etc) to represent themselves in the parliament and they have freedom in practicing their religions and traditions.
But if you ask me whether is it justifiable according to Wahabi laws? The answer is Yes. As they consider Sheikh Nimr to be a disbeliever and killing him is not only allowed but a recommended act that they will be rewarded by performing it!

Q: What should human rights organizations as well as international bodies like the UN, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, etc, do with regards to this verdict?
A: The UN is under the control of the American imperialist system and only works for the benefit of this system. As for us, we must stand as Muslims, and show our support and rejection. Every community or party can study the steps that they can take according to where they live and the freedom they have. Perhaps in the west we can show our support through contacting human rights organizations and also through protesting in front of the Saudi embassy under the slogan of “we are all Sheikh Al-Nimr”.

Q: What can the media do about it?
A: Again media is under the control of the American imperialist system, but today’s media is not limited to newspapers or television. In fact social media is more powerful than television. We can use media to educate our communities, guide and encourage them to be active in standing and supporting the case of Sheikh Nimr in the way they find best.

Q: Will this issue lead to the deterioration of relations between Saudi Arabia and Shia-majority countries like Iran, Lebanon and Iraq?
A: Governments work in a different way than societies, there is a system that they must follow in facing this problem and it can’t be announced publicly until they decide

/129

Egypt: Al-Azhar Sheikh Invited to Attend Ashura Mourning Ceremony

An Egyptian Shia activist has invited Al-Azhar’s Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayyeb to attend the Ashura mourning ceremony at Cairo’s Imam Hussein (AS) Mosque.

Sayyid Taher al-Hashemi, who is a member of the Ahl-ul-Bayt World Assembly, asked al-Tayyeb to deliver a speech in the program on the event of Ashura, Bawaba website reported.

He also invited Egyptian Awqaf ministry official and members of the country’s Islamic Studies Center to take part in the ceremony.

Al-Hashemi’s call has drawn some objections, however. Muhammad al-Shahat, secretary general of Egypt’s Supreme Islamic Affairs Council, considered it to be a move aimed at “introducing Shia ideology and imposing Shia school of thought on Sunnis”.

Due to anti-Shia propaganda, Egyptian Shias face a lot of challenges living and practicing their faith freely in a country that spent a significant part of its history under Shia rule.

Every year, millions of Shias and other Muslims around the world mourn the martyrdom of Imam Hussein (AS) and his 72 faithful companions on Ashura, the tenth day of the first month of the lunar calendar year, Muharram.

Ashura ceremonies symbolize eternal and unwavering stance of truth against falsehood and humanity’s struggle against tyranny realized by Imam Hussein (AS).

This year, the day of Ashura falls on Tuesday, November 4.

 

/129

Saudi Criminal Court sentenced a Shia activist to 9 years in prison

On October 27, the Specialized Criminal Court in Riyadh sentenced the activist ‘Mohammad Salih Abdullah al-Zanadi’, from Awwamiyah town, to 9 years in prison.

Al-Zanadi was arrested by a security force on 23 March 2012. He was injured when the force opened fire on him in Jomoma district in Awwmiyah. He was taken to al-Dahran military hospital, then to al-Dahran prison.

Al-Zanadi, one of 23 wanted persons on a list Interior Ministry, was accused of disobeying the ruler, inciting disorder, the fomentation of sedition and sowing seeds of discord among citizens, trying to assassinated the security member, and possession weapons.

?129

Mass trek of people to Muharram Majalis in Bauchi, Nigeria + Pics

In continuation of Muharram Majalis across Nigeria by members of the Shiite Islamic Movement of Nigeria under His Eminence Sheikh Ibraheem Yaqoub Zakzaky, mass trek of people is being witnessed to the event in various locates. These are the pictures of the mass trek of people in Bauch to the mourning session.